Micronote: A proposition on possible propulsion of UFO's..
Date: 13/05/2026
Version: 0.0
Nobody reads this ofcourse. Indeed..., why would anyone visit such an Utterly Stupid site as this one?
That's certainly True. Anyway, here I like to present a rather peculiar vision on possible propulsion of UFO's .
Why such note? Well, About 9 years ago, I was cycling in Switserland (region Appenzell), a region with somewhat lower hills
and valley's and such stuff.... (At that time, I was not in the real Alps where the monster mountains are).
At about 7.00pm, while I was at such hill, I was staring into shallow valley, and below were some farms, and a very small village.
Then... I saw a blue glowing sphere (orb), moving slowly in that valley. At certain moments, it made insanely irratic movements
(fast up and down, left right, sometimes pausing for short moments).
This show lasted for about 15 sec. Then, it shot from one side of the valley to the opposite site, in a split sec,
covering about 1 mile (1.6km).
That's not possible for any physical object. Also any manmade craft would be severy damaged (due to enormous g forces).
So, it could also be an unknown natural phenomena. However, I believe it is not. We do not see
(if you would believe my observation) anything similar in Nature.
So do I believe that such "objects" are not from Earth? Yes I do.
You likely know, that there exist quite a few (sort of) reliable accounts of such events,
like the USS Nimitz UFO incident.
Some accounts refer to spherical objects, or "tic-tac" like objects.
Now..., my problem is a mass/inertial problem. Well, such a sudden irratic manouvers are actually "impossible"
for man-made objects. So.... now what?
One aspect of my trial to come to a solution, is using (misusing a physicist might say),
of the theory of Kaluza (or Kaluza-Klein), which tried to Unify the Gravity theory of Einstein, and Maxwell's ElectroDynamics.
Kaluza made his theory public (sort of) in 1920. Much later, it also formed (sort of) an inspiration for
modern string theories.
As said, the hope is to try to find a hypothesis, which "decoples" intertia from a fundamental metric
so that an object indeed might perform manouvres, as quite a few witnesses have observed.
Also, that might also be a basis for (easier) interstellar travel.
By the way: the idea to try to use multi-dimensional theories to explain UFO propulsion, is not new.
In my silly words:
Kaluza "unified" Einstein's theory of General Relativity, and Maxwell's ElectroDynamics (electromagnetism), into
a 5 dimensional framework.
The crux is, that by adding an extra dimension to the 4 dimensional metric (as is used in Einstein's equations),
it is possible to describle the motion of a charged particle, as to follow a "geodesic" as well, very similar as
to the original proposition of a motion in Einstein's General Relativity.
Kaluza showed, using a 5 dimensional approach of Einstein’s GR, how both Electromagnetism and Gravity
could be treated in a uniform fashion, namely in the sense that both are described as parts of a five-dimensional metric.
A metric (like e.g. how SpaceTime and matter/energy, evolve) can be expressed in equations, or using a matrix/tensor.
A 4x4 matrix describes a 4D "world", and a 5x5 matrix would describe a 5D "world".
So, a rather daring proposition of (Kaluza) and Klein then would be that our 5 dimensional metric looks like:
Note the "new" ωij elements in this 5 dimensional metric.
The first 4x4 elements should describe Gravity, while the last row/column is associated with ElectroDynamics.
Now, all elements in this new metric must contain information for the unified Theory, but the last column
and the lowest row, should express specifically the unified ElectroMagnetic components.
Mr. X asks: "So... Albert, nice, but what is the "use" in UFO prpulsion methods ????? Well ????"
Well, a good mathematical/physical framework is needed ofcourse. But first, a simple analogy:
Suppose you have a swimming pool. Now, the water contains "water" (ofcourse), but a lot of disolved air as well.
If you could seperate those two sub-metrics, while deep in the water, you don't have the nasty proprties
of water hindring you (like the drag). If you would place a watertight tube in the water (remember: simple analogy!!!)
you have only the air properties inside the tube (while the whole bunch is deep inside the pool).
In 4 dim Einstein SpaceTime, we have mass/energy (and inertia) tightly woven in SpaceTime.
If we can escape the Einsteinic properties, or detach it from our local reality, we in effect can move
freely and quickly from A to B.
Note that we did not destroyed the Universal Unification as ment by Kaluza and Klein. Instead, we created
conditions that freed us from Gravity and inertia....
Maybe it's a nice idea..., but solid argumentation from Physics is still missing....
Well, I will attempt to make one... It's, however, possible that this will FAIL, and would be impossible to do so.
Notes:
1. I have actually two personal observations of strange spheres. One is described above, while the other
was earlier (maybe 12, or 13 years ago, I am not sure anymore...) in Spain. However, I also noticed that they are
always bright and seems to emit quite a lot of light. This brightness also helped me to arrive
to the idea that the 4-dim metric is locally detached (local reality), while the ElectroDynamic component is still there.
In the later incident (describe above, in Switserland), I had much more time to observe the object, compared to the event
in Spain. Here, I saw that sphere only for a few seconds before it dissappeared.
2. As proposed by Kaluza, and somewhat later enhanced by Klein, the 5D unification of Einstein and Maxwell
is everywhere, as could be described by a matrix/tensor metric. But this metric could be projected
into sub components. As semi-evidence are the sphere/tic-tac objects, which seem to have no trouble of cancelling Gravity,
and no problem with Inertia.
3. This note has nothing to do with wormholes, as might be percieved due to the simple analogy of a tube
in a swimming pool. However, the start and end of the projection, might be associated with Portals.
Let's continue. It's indeed so, that Gravitational mass en Inertial mass, are equivalent in 4D Newtonian
or Einstein's Gravitational Theories.
But..., in a 5D situation, like Kaluza-Klein (KK), there are differences (!).
There are lots of articles (like in the "arxiv" library) which explore this fact. So far, it's all "theoretic" ofcourse.
Tip: You can try using your favourite AI program, like CHATGPT, to ask for differences in Gravitational mass and Inertial mass,
in 4D Einstein theory, and in 5D Kaluza-Klein Theory.
However, it's possible you get a lot of mathematical material back.
So..., let's try to make a consistent, relatively easy "concept document". May take some time.....